[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Navigation, was Re: Idea : common dir and tree
On Jul 26, 2:49pm, Stein Gjoen wrote:
> Subject: Re: Navigation, was Re: Idea : common dir and tree
> Guylhem Aznar wrote:
> > Would you have time to sum up the current agreed propositions,
> > including dir. tree?
> I'll try:
> Proposal v1.0
> Tree structure (FHS compliant, ref http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ ):
> HOWTO/ - the HOWTOs in HTML format goes here
> index.html - Our cover page (*)
> 00-index - a contents list for file and FTP browsers
> (other relevant pages linked to from index.html above)
- With many potential files/HOWTOs, these additional sub-directories
(PDF, text, etc) will be virtually unnoticed. We need to provide
pointers to the sub-directories within the index.html files.
- Will we utilize the single-page HOWTOs or the multi-page HOWTOs?
- What about HOWTOs that currently are contained in their own
sub-directory? We need to consider that (all DocBook-authored
HOWTOs are like that).
- Need to provide a commonly-shared image directory, such as what
we have now on www.linuxdoc.org (for call-outs, etc). Should be
at the same level as the other sub-dirs (unless we munge the
HTML to convert links/references).
- I can get you a file-count if need be (I need to know if the single
or multi-page variants will be used).
> text/ - same HOWTOS but as plain text
> PDF/ - same HOWTOS but as PDF
- Contains gzipped tar files or exploded (SGML) text + graphics files
for each HOWTO? Again, possibly in their own sub-dirs.
- Do we need a split for linuxdoc v. docbook (?):
- Is it just me, or is anyone else annoyed by upper/mixed-case? :-)
I'd personally like to see lower-case used for all the sub-dir names,
but that's simply a personal preference.
- What goes in the 'HTML' directory, given that all HTML HOWTOs will
be in /usr/share/HOWTO ? Is it still necessary?
> GUIDES/ - the Guides in HTML format
- Again, a decision on upper/lower/mixed case..perhaps:
HOWTO, FAQ, guides, etc. Again, my personal preference.
> The index.html marked with (*) is based on the main page you see
> when you browse http://www.LinuxDoc.org/ with some minor exceptions:
> - the links from that page point to files on disk using relative
> file:// URLs. Remember many do not have online access.
All links on www.linuxdoc.org are currently relative (and work
in a local/non-web-server environment). We needed to have it this
way for our mirror sites.
> - added links that point to the corresponding area at LinuxDoc.org
> in order to get the latest copy for those who are online.
> Example: the link looks like "Guides [web]"
> where Guides points to file://guides.html
> and [web] points to http://www.linuxdoc.org/guides.html
Very good idea.
> (PS: I am going on a 3 week holiday starting this weekend and I
> am unlikely to be reachable over the net during this period. The
> entry to LWN has been submitted and might make it for this weeks
I hate to switch gears, but was there ever any resolution or
follow-up on the c.o.l.a posting problem?
Greg Ferguson - s/w engr / mtlhd | firstname.lastname@example.org
SGI Tech Pubs - http://techpubs.sgi.com |
Linux Doc Project - http://www.linuxdoc.org |
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org